General information
Part of Conflict: China - Vietnam (North Vietnam)
Date of first stated goals of incompatibility: 1974-01-11
Comment on date of first stated goal of incompatibility: The question of which country had the territorial rights to the Paracel Islands had been disputed ever since Japan renounced its claims to them following the end of World War II. The main contenders were China and Vietnam, although also Brunei, Malaysia and the Philippines had made claims over the years. The status of the Spratly Islands were also contested by these countries.
The Paracel Islands lie about 165 miles south-east of the Chinese islands of Hainan and 225 miles east if Vietnam. The Paracels consist of about 130 small island, none larger than a square mile. The Spratly Islands are situated in the South China Sea and lie about 300 miles east of Vietnam and 300 miles west of the Philippines. China based its claim to the Islands on old maps, British surveys as well as on their regular use by Chinese fishermen. South Vietnam, on the other hand, cited maps issued by the Empire of Annam in 1834 and also claimed that the Paracel Islands had been transferred from France to Vietnam in 1919. In 1933, France took control over the Spratly Islands, but the Islands were formally annexed by Japan six years later. However, when Japan later, in 1951, in a peace treaty renounced its claims to both the Paracel (which also had been annexed by Japan during World War II) and the Spratly Islands, it was not specified which country the Islands belonged to.
In September 1973, South Vietnam announced its formal incorporation of the Paracel Islands. In the previous month, South Vietnam had begun granting contracts for oil exploration. The islands were thought to contain oil deposits, although this was never independently confirmed. The South Vietnamese incorporation of the islands was contested by China on 11 January 1974. In its statement, the Chinese Foreign Ministry stated that the Paracel Islands, as well as the Spratly Islands, belonged to China and described the South Vietnamese actions as “a wanton infringement of Chinas territorial integrity and sovereignty”. The Chinese statement was in turn rejected by the South Vietnamese Foreign Ministry on the following day.
The territorial disputes over the islands were followed by several border disputes, both on land and at sea. These disputes were strongly linked to regional developments, including the Vietnamese invasion of Cambodia in 1978, China’s support to the Khmer Rouge, Vietnam’s relations to the Soviet Union and China’s relations to the USA.
Date of first use of armed force: 1974-01-19
Comment on date of first use of armed force: In September 1973, South Vietnam announced its formal incorporation of the Paracel Islands. The South Vietnamese incorporation of the islands was contested by China on 11 January 1974. In its statement, the Chinese Foreign Ministry stated that the Paracel Islands, as well as the Spratly Islands, belonged to China and described the South Vietnamese actions as “a wanton infringement of Chinas territorial integrity and sovereignty”. The Chinese statement was in turn rejected by the South Vietnamese Foreign Ministry on the following day.
According to South Vietnam, 11 Chinese warships entered the Paracel Islands area on 16 January 1974 and landed troops on a few of the islands. South Vietnamese troops were sent to one of these islands the following day and claimed to have removed a Chinese flag, but found no Chinese troops. On 19 January, the first military encounter on the islands took place. A South Vietnamese patrol came upon Chinese troops on one of the islands, the latter open fire and killed two South Vietnamese troops. The clash was then followed by further clashes at sea. The South Vietnamese Foreign Ministry claimed that a Chinese escort ship had opened fire on a South Vietnamese destroyer, while China claimed that it was the South Vietnamese that had fired the first round. Further clashes were reported on the next day, on 20 January.
Despite claims about having inflicted heavier damage to the Chinese than they had received, South Vietnam withdrew from the islands on 20 January. The islands were then immediately taken over by the Chinese, who also took a number of Vietnamese inhabitants as prisoners. These were eventually handed over to South Vietnam one month later. At the same time, South Vietnam reinforced their presence on the Spratly Islands. There are diverging reports on the number of people killed in the clashes. According to Vietnam, 19 of their soldiers died while a large number of soldiers were reported as missing. China reportedly lost 18 soldiers. Thus, at least 37 people were killed during the two days of battle.
First Battle Related Death: 1974-01-19
Comment on First Battle Related Death: In September 1973, South Vietnam announced its formal incorporation of the Paracel Islands. The South Vietnamese incorporation of the islands was contested by China on 11 January 1974. In its statement, the Chinese Foreign Ministry stated that the Paracel Islands, as well as the Spratly Islands, belonged to China and described the South Vietnamese actions as “a wanton infringement of Chinas territorial integrity and sovereignty”. The Chinese statement was in turn rejected by the South Vietnamese Foreign Ministry on the following day.
According to South Vietnam, 11 Chinese warships entered the Paracel Islands area on 16 January 1974 and landed troops on a few of the islands. South Vietnamese troops were sent to one of these islands the following day and claimed to have removed a Chinese flag, but found no Chinese troops. On 19 January, the first military encounter on the islands took place. A South Vietnamese patrol came upon Chinese troops on one of the islands, the latter open fire and killed two South Vietnamese troops. The clash was then followed by further clashes at sea. The South Vietnamese Foreign Ministry claimed that a Chinese escort ship had opened fire on a South Vietnamese destroyer, while China claimed that it was the South Vietnamese that had fired the first round. Further clashes were reported on the next day, on 20 January.
Despite claims about having inflicted heavier damage to the Chinese than they had received, South Vietnam withdrew from the islands on 20 January. The islands were then immediately taken over by the Chinese, who also took a number of Vietnamese inhabitants as prisoners. These were eventually handed over to South Vietnam one month later. At the same time, South Vietnam reinforced their presence on the Spratly Islands. There are diverging reports on the number of people killed in the clashes. According to Vietnam, 19 of their soldiers died while a large number of soldiers were reported as missing. China reportedly lost 18 soldiers. Thus, at least 37 people were killed during the two days of battle.
Date when dyad reached 25 battle releated deaths: 1974-01-20
Comment on date when dyad reached 25 battle related deaths: In September 1973, South Vietnam announced its formal incorporation of the Paracel Islands. The South Vietnamese incorporation of the islands was contested by China on 11 January 1974. In its statement, the Chinese Foreign Ministry stated that the Paracel Islands, as well as the Spratly Islands, belonged to China and described the South Vietnamese actions as "a wanton infringement of Chinas territorial integrity and sovereignty". The Chinese statement was in turn rejected by the South Vietnamese Foreign Ministry on the following day.
According to South Vietnam, 11 Chinese warships entered the Paracel Islands area on 16 January 1974 and landed troops on a few of the islands. South Vietnamese troops were sent to one of these islands the following day and claimed to have removed a Chinese flag, but found no Chinese troops. On 19 January, the first military encounter on the islands took place. A South Vietnamese patrol came upon Chinese troops on one of the islands, the latter open fire and killed two South Vietnamese troops. The clash was then followed by further clashes at sea. The South Vietnamese Foreign Ministry claimed that a Chinese escort ship had opened fire on a South Vietnamese destroyer, while China claimed that it was the South Vietnamese that had fired the first round. Further clashes were reported on the next day, on 20 January.
Despite claims about having inflicted heavier damage to the Chinese than they had received, South Vietnam withdrew from the islands on 20 January. The islands were then immediately taken over by the Chinese, who also took a number of Vietnamese inhabitants as prisoners. These were eventually handed over to South Vietnam one month later. At the same time, South Vietnam reinforced their presence on the Spratly Islands. There are diverging reports on the number of people killed in the clashes. According to Vietnam, 19 of their soldiers died while a large number of soldiers were reported as missing. China reportedly lost 18 soldiers. Thus, at least 37 people were killed during the two days of battle.
The date of when the dyad reached 25 battle-related deaths is set to 20 January, since it is not clear if more than 25 people were killed on the first day of the clashes (19 January).
Conflict issues
Annual information
This section contains annual information systematically collected by the UCDP.
1978
| Estimated Fatalities | |
|---|---|
| High | 25 |
| Best | 25 |
| Low | 0 |
Secondary Warring Support:
Side A (Government of China): n/a
Side B (Government of Vietnam (North Vietnam)): n/a
1979
| Estimated Fatalities | |
|---|---|
| High | 1000 |
| Best | 1000 |
| Low | 0 |
Secondary Warring Support:
Side A (Government of China): n/a
Side B (Government of Vietnam (North Vietnam)): n/a
1980
| Estimated Fatalities | |
|---|---|
| High | 25 |
| Best | 25 |
| Low | 0 |
Secondary Warring Support:
Side A (Government of China): n/a
Side B (Government of Vietnam (North Vietnam)): n/a
1981
| Estimated Fatalities | |
|---|---|
| High | 25 |
| Best | 25 |
| Low | 0 |
Secondary Warring Support:
Side A (Government of China): n/a
Side B (Government of Vietnam (North Vietnam)): n/a
1983
| Estimated Fatalities | |
|---|---|
| High | 25 |
| Best | 25 |
| Low | 0 |
Secondary Warring Support:
Side A (Government of China): n/a
Side B (Government of Vietnam (North Vietnam)): n/a
1984
| Estimated Fatalities | |
|---|---|
| High | 25 |
| Best | 25 |
| Low | 0 |
Secondary Warring Support:
Side A (Government of China): n/a
Side B (Government of Vietnam (North Vietnam)): n/a
1986
| Estimated Fatalities | |
|---|---|
| High | 25 |
| Best | 25 |
| Low | 0 |
Secondary Warring Support:
Side A (Government of China): n/a
Side B (Government of Vietnam (North Vietnam)): n/a
1987
| Estimated Fatalities | |
|---|---|
| High | 25 |
| Best | 25 |
| Low | 0 |
Secondary Warring Support:
Side A (Government of China): n/a
Side B (Government of Vietnam (North Vietnam)): n/a
1988
| Estimated Fatalities | |
|---|---|
| High | 25 |
| Best | 25 |
| Low | 0 |
Secondary Warring Support:
Side A (Government of China): n/a
Side B (Government of Vietnam (North Vietnam)): n/a
Dyad Archive
This section contains annual information no longer systematically collected by the UCDP.
1978 Dyad Archive
Comment on Yearly Battle Related Deaths: The number of battle-related deaths in this dyad is unclear, but activity at the least surpassed 25 battle-related deaths.
Comment on Active: In 1978, border clashes were reported to have taken place on a number of locations along the 1200 km long border between China and Vietnam. The exact locations, however, were seldom mentioned, often due to limited independent reporting.
Parallel to the border clashes, a number of incidents took place at sea. Both sides made accusations about armed ships firing on fishing boats and trawlers, all of which were claimed to have led to fatalities.
Negotiations: YES
Comment on Negotiations: There were some negotiations in 1978 regarding the joint border, although China ruled out any negotiations on the status of the disputed islands. Border talks were held in October 1978, but neither on this topic did the two countries manage to reach an agreement.
Victory: NO
Terminated: NO
1979 Dyad Archive
Comment on Yearly Battle Related Deaths: "The number of battle-related deaths for this year is difficult to estimate, but it is clear that the fighting led to more than 1000 battle-related deaths, which is the threshold for a conflict to be coded as war.
The reports on the number of people killed in the fighting varies, some sources claims that over 50 000 troops (both Chinese and Vietnamese) died during the months of fighting. Vietnam claimed 62 500 Chinese troops had been either killed or wounded, but later stated that 20 000 Chinese troops had been killed. China on the other hand claimed that 20 000 Chinese troops and 50 000 Vietnamese troops had been killed."
Comment on Active: On 17 February 1979, the situation at the Chinese-Vietnamese border escalated to a full-scale border war. It was reported that 75 000 Chinese troops invaded Vietnam along the whole joint border. Initially, China managed to capture five provincial capitals, including Cao Bang, Lang Son, Lao Cai and Cam Duong. However, Vietnam launched a heavy counterattack and the Chinese troops eventually had to pull back. In the beginning of March, China announced that all troops were to be withdrawn from Vietnam. Despite this, there were several reports of clashes along the border throughout the rest of the year.
Negotiations: YES
Comment on Negotiations: Even though both China and Vietnam early on expressed a willingness to negotiate, talks did not begin until 18 April 1979, since Vietnam claimed that Chinese troops had not withdrawn completely. The talks, which lasted until 18 May, were held in Hanoi and the Vietnamese delegation immediately put forward a three-point proposal for a settlement to the conflict. The proposal included a demilitarised zone, an end to all hostile activities, restoration of railways, and civil aviation, a recognition of the border conventions of 1887 and 1895.
The Chinese delegation subsequently put forward another proposals. The eight-point proposal included a restoration of friendly relations through respect for sovereignty and territorial integrity, and an agreement that none of the parties would seek hegemony in Indo-China or South-East Asia or station troops in other countries (this was a clear reference to Vietnam’s invasion of Cambodia). China also suggested that while waiting for a settlement on border disputes, the status quo that had existed in 1957-58 should be maintained. Another dispute revolved around the Gulf of Tonkin. On this matter China argued that the line should be drawn in accordance to international law. Furthermore, Vietnam were to recognise and respect China’s rights to the Paracel and Spratly Islands. There was also a paragraph on the importance of guaranteeing the rights and interest of foreigners living in one another countries, and that Vietnam would resettle the ethnic Chinese that had been expelled from Vietnam.
After these proposals had been put forward, the talks continued for one month, but without any substantial results. Both sides strongly rejected the other’s proposals and several rounds of accusations and counter accusations regarding attacks along the joint border took place.
After a pause in the negotiations, the parties met once again on 28 June, this time in Peking. New proposals, although largely with the same content as the previous ones, were presented, but also these talks ended without an agreement. The border tensions increased during July, which led to protest letters being exchanged between the governments. Despite the failure to reach an agreement, the second round of negotiations were not halted until 19 December.
Victory: NO
Terminated: NO
1980 Dyad Archive
Comment on Yearly Battle Related Deaths: The number of battle-related deaths for this year is difficult to estimate, but it is clear that the border clashes led to more than 25 battle-related deaths.
Comment on Active: In 1980, there were several reports of border clashes and incursions along the Chinese-Vietnamese border, but the exact locations of these were seldom stated. One area, however, that was mentioned was the Xin Man area in Vietnam. Vietnamese officials claimed that the area had been repeatedly attacked by Chinese troops in the beginning of October. The allegation was ignored by China, which instead responded with new allegations of Vietnamese attacks. In December, China also claimed that Vietnamese troops had conducted several incursions into the Yunnan province and the autonomous region of Guangxi Zhuang.
Negotiations: NO
Comment on Negotiations: In December 1979, the lengthy rounds of negotiations ended without any progress on settling the range of disputes between the two countries. New talks were then proposed for 1980, but throughout the year, China rejected all of Vietnam’s proposals of negotiations. China motivated their rejection of talks by stating that the negotiations would not produce any results until Vietnam withdrew from Cambodia.
Victory: NO
Terminated: NO
1981 Dyad Archive
Comment on Yearly Battle Related Deaths: The number of battle-related deaths for this year is difficult to estimate, but it is clear that the border clashes led to more than 25 battle-related deaths.
Comment on Active: In 1981, a large amount of accusations and counteraccusations were made by both China and Vietnam. A number of locations along the joint border were given in connections to these allegations, including the Lang Son and Ha Tuyen provinces in Vietnam and the Yunnan province and the Fakashan area of the Guangxi Zhuang autonomous region in China.
In August, Vietnam stated that Chinese troops still occupied Hill 400 in the Lang Son province, as well as other hill positions in the Vi Xuyen district of Ha Tuyen province (all of which had been seized in May).
Negotiations: NO
Victory: NO
Terminated: YES
Type of termination: No or Low Activity
Date of termination: 1981-12-31
Comment on Termination: The conflict was coded as terminated at the end of 1981 due to low activity. It is likely that clashes occurred also in 1982, but there were not enough specific reports about battle-related deaths to code the conflict as active in 1982.
1983 Dyad Archive
Comment on Yearly Battle Related Deaths: The number of battle-related deaths for this year is difficult to estimate, but it is clear that the border clashes led to more than 25 battle-related deaths.
Comment on Active: The majority of the fighting in 1983 took place in the Guangxi Zhuangzu autonomous region as well as in the border region of the Chinese Yunnan province.
Negotiations: NO
Victory: NO
Terminated: NO
1984 Dyad Archive
Comment on Yearly Battle Related Deaths: The number of battle-related deaths for this year is difficult to estimate, but it is clear that the border clashes led to more than 25 battle-related deaths.
Comment on Active: Following an escalation of the tensions in the beginning of 1984, China launched an offensive on 2 April along a 400-km long section of the border that neighboured the Yunnan province and Guangxi Zhuang autonomous region. The fighting that followed were claimed to have taken place in several locations along the border. China claimed that Vietnamese troops had crossed the border into the Yunnan province and laid landmines, while Vietnam stated that Chinese troops had fired into the Ha Tuyen, Cao Bang and Lang Son provinces. In May, Vietnam stated that China had fired in the town of Ha Giand, located 12 miles from the border.
Although clashes continued to be reported throughout the rest of 1984, the most intense fighting seem to have taken place in April and May.
Negotiations: NO
Victory: NO
Terminated: YES
Type of termination: No or Low Activity
Date of termination: 1984-12-31
Comment on Termination: The conflict was coded as terminated at the end of 1984 due to low activity. It is likely that clashes occurred also in 1985, but there were not enough specific reports about battle-related deaths to code the conflict as active in 1985.
1986 Dyad Archive
Comment on Yearly Battle Related Deaths: The number of battle-related deaths for this year is difficult to estimate, but it is clear that the border clashes led to more than 25 battle-related deaths.
Comment on Active: In 1986, the most intense fighting appeared to have taken place on the border between the Vietnamese province of Ha Tuyen and the Chinese province of Yunnan. Earlier in the year, China accused Vietnam of firing into the Yunnan province. This type of accusations continued in intervals throughout the year, but there was often a lack of independent reporting and thus difficult to verify these claims.
Negotiations: NO
Victory: NO
Terminated: NO
1987 Dyad Archive
Comment on Yearly Battle Related Deaths: The number of battle-related deaths for this year is difficult to estimate, but it is clear that the border clashes led to more than 25 battle-related deaths.
Comment on Active: In early January 1987, heavy fighting was reported to have taken place between troops stationed on the border between the Ha Tuyen province (Vietnam) and the Yunnan province (China).
More clashes in the Yunnan border region, as well as in the Guangxi Zhuang region, were reported in February and March. Since March, the fighting seemed to have decreased, even though China accused Vietnam of invading the Spratly Islands in the South China Sea and stated that China would eventually retake them (see China-Vietnam first use of armed violence for more information about these Islands).
Negotiations: NO
Victory: NO
Terminated: NO
1988 Dyad Archive
Comment on Yearly Battle Related Deaths: In 1988, clashes erupted in mid-March when Chinese troops landed on the Spratly Islands and shortly afterwards were reported to have sunken a Vietnamese gunboat, killing Vietnamese soldiers. No best and high estimates are given since no further information is available.
Comment on Active: There were no further reports of fighting along the Chinese-Vietnamese border in 1988, however clashes took place in March in the area of the Spratly Islands, located in the South China Sea. Eventually, Vietnam withdrew unilaterally and despite continued tensions, there were no confirmed reports about further clashes in 1988.
Negotiations: NO
Victory: NO
Terminated: YES
Type of termination: No or Low Activity
Date of termination: 1988-12-31
Comment on Termination: The conflict was coded as terminated at the end of 1988, since there were no further reports about clashes between China and Vietnam in 1989. In 1991, the two countries decided to normalise relations and a working group was subsequently appointed to discuss the territorial disputes. In 1993, China began to clear landmines along the Chinese-Vietnamese border. However, the status of the Paracel and the Spratly Islands remains unsolved and several countries continues to claim the islands. The demarcation of the border between China and Vietnam was completed in 2008.