General information
Part of Conflict: Peru: Government
Date of first stated goals of incompatibility: 1980-03-27
Comment on date of first stated goal of incompatibility: Sendero Luminoso was formed in the late 1960s by university professor Abimael Guzman and the stated goal was to destroy existing Peruvian institutions and replace them with peasant revolutionary regime. It held as examples former indigenous rebel leaders, particularly Juan Santos Atahualpa and Tupac Amaru. The group, initially conceived as a political party, went underground in 1978. Between 17 and 27 March 1980 the Central Committee of the party held meetings on an action plan for the Beginning of the Armed Struggle (BAS). On the final day of the meetings, red flags were drawn in notebooks and covered the walls. The universal exhortation above the flags proclaimed: "Let us begin to tear down the walls and unfurl the first light of dawn." The organization came to public attention in May 1980 when the armed struggle initiated.
Date of first use of armed force: 1980-05-17
Comment on date of first use of armed force: Sendero Luminoso initiated its armed struggle against the Peruvian Government in the Andean village Chuschi in the province of Cangallo, Ayacucho on 17 May 1980.
First Battle Related Death: 1981-08-15
Comment on First Battle Related Death: The first deaths in connection to the conflict occurred in Ayacucho on 24 December 1980 when Shining Path rebels killed a ranch owner, Benigno Medina, and two of his employees at the San Agustín de Ayzarca ranch. During the second half of 1980 several dynamite attacks had been carried out by Sendero Luminoso to announce "the peoples war". However, the first battle related death reported took place on 15 August in Ayacucho when three Sendero Luminoso rebels entered a police station, took it in their control and killed a police officer named Flores Sullca.
Date when dyad reached 25 battle releated deaths: 1982-08-22
Comment on date when dyad reached 25 battle related deaths: Between 1980 and 1982 the activities of Sendero Luminoso passed through three stages: 1) Acts of violence to draw the attention to the group, 2) attacks on business premises and banks with the objective of obtaining funds and 3) actions against police posts in remote areas with the aim of seizing weapons. A fourth stage was to lead to the eventual seizure of power. The first two stages of the conflict did not seem to result in many causalities; however, the intensity increased at the third stage. On 22 August 1982, 200 guerrillas attacked a civil guard post in Ayacucho province with machine-guns and dynamite. 20 guerrillas and 5 policemen were killed in a four-hour battle. It is possible, however, that the conflict reached 25 battle related deaths before that date.
Conflict issues
Conflict Goal Issues: Sendero Luminoso (/#/actor/750), also known as Partido Comunista del Perú - Sendero Luminoso (PCP-SL) was a Marxist-Leninist-Maoist rebel group in Peru(/#/country/135) that fought the Peruvian government(/#/actor/021) in an armed conflict(/#/conflict/292) from 1981 to 2000. One of its distinct characteristics was its Gonzalo Thought alignment, highlighting Maoist and Nationalist positionings. The dyad here presented (Government-Sendero Luminoso)(/#/dyad/631) was mainly analyzed from 1989 to 1999 and from 2007 to 2010, when the group was the most active, but it is worth noting that the rebel group was created years earlier and continued existing after what is approached here, especially because it divided itself in 1994 but continued being relevant in the Peruvian scene. Throughout the 1980s and 1990s emerged many opposition forces as a reflex of the discontent with the governing powers in Peru.
The PCP-SL was created on 1969 by Abimael Guzmán (known as Presidente Gonzalo) and since the beginning, as a political group, it stated its desires of changing the political system to a Socialist one. On 1982, when the 25 battle-deaths threshold was reached, an intrastate conflict with the government began, perduring throughout 1980s and 1990s. At that same year the rebel group stated that a New State should rise and that only in this way there would be the dictatorship of the proletariat. During the year of 1895 the group tried to intervene on national elections being a clear obstacle to the government. As from the point the coding starts (1989), it is possible to see how the group maintained its cohesion throughout the 1980s – one of the first coded conflict goal issues reveals the group’s desire to proceed with the plan of a people's war “so that it shows the full validity of the power of Maoism and conquers power in the whole country”, aligned with the Gonzalo thought since its foundation. Much of these stated issues regarded changes on economic system, participation, land reforms and the maintaining of one of the first requirements of the group: deposing the executive power to implement a “New State”. It is worth noting that on this year the MRTA(/#/actor/751) became active in the conflict with the government.
On the following year, 1990, a major political change occurred with the election of the new head of the government, Alberto Fujimori, who responded to PCP-SL with ra even bigger repressive force. Conflicts continued throughout that year and following, especially regarding the issues of Electoral fraud and Opposition to elections, while still pointing to corruption, the need for economic reforms and the restructuration of military forces, always maintaining the requests for the destitution of the full executive power. The then leader of PCP-SL, Abimael Guzmán, was captured in 1992 and incarcerated, destabilizing the group. On the next years the group divided itself in other factions, mainly because of procedural strategy differences, but still maintaining the core objectives of Sendero Luminoso. A hardline faction led by Oscar Ramírez Durand (known as Feliciano) continued with the armed struggle in guerrilla style. On 1999 Oscar Ramírez Durand was captured by Peruvian authorities. Throughout those years, since Guzmán’s capture, the violent activity of the group diminished sharply, being 1999 the last year with relevant data regarding the group. The rebel group still maintained its goals with the conflict, point out many times to corruption, electoral fraud and opposition to elections. As the group lost ground in regards to the violent battle against the government, it changed a little its approach, requesting civil and labor rights, freedom of expression and the rule of law.
From 2004 to 2006 the split groups started organizing themselves to join forces and return to the armed struggle. On 2007 the conflict escalated to a point of relevance, mainly around the area of La Mar Province, Ayacucho, where they benefited from the economic activity of growing coca for cocaine production. On December of 2011 the then leader of Sendero Luminoso, Comrade Artemio, announced that the military struggle was over and that they wanted to continue the group struggles, but by political means, aiming to negotiate an enduring peace with the government.
Among the many stated conflict goals that can be perceived since the creation of the rebel group in 1981, and specially with the escalation of activities throughout the coded period of 1989 to 1995, the main issues regarded state structures – more specifically a change of political system, mainly refered as to a Socialist State. From 1995 to 1999 the main issues regarded political rights, mainly refered to civil rights, participation and other rights. At the ressurgence from 2007 to 2011 there where no main issues stated as conflict goals issues, as it kept the basically the same demands from previous years.
Conflict Dynamics Issues: In regards to conflict dynamic issues, the data that was collected and concentrated from 1989 to 1995 marked fluctuation of violence, mainly because of the election of 1990 and the arrest of Abimael Guzmán in 1992. The reclamations by the rebel group focused in the accusation of genocide by the part of the government, disrespecting of human rights and high levels of violence. The period after the election of Alberto Fujimori was key to these dynamics issues, as his government focused a lot in the fight against Sendero Luminoso. This was still relevant until the point of the capture of Oscar Ramírez Durand on 1999. Regarding the resurgence from 2007 to 2011, conflict dynamics issues changed, as the group restructured itself to the armed struggle, but was still active in the political and social scene throughout the beginning of the XXI century.
Among the many stated conflict dynamics issues, specifically before 1995, it is necessary to highlight atrocities and abuses by the part of the government – more specifically, collective targeting for political reasons. There are some instances of requests regarding the removal of foreign influence and attention to military conduct, but all surrounding the abuses of power by the government against the rebel group. From 1995 to 1999 the requests for attention regarding collective targeting for political reasons by the part of the government continued, as the requests regarding the removal of foreign influence increased. From 2007 to 2011, it can be highlighted the requests for increase of foreign influence in regards to support and accountability, and the release of prisoners.
Conflict Resolution Issues: In regards to conflict resolution issue, the data that was collected is concentrated from the year of 1991 to 2006, after Fujimori’s election. The main conflict resolution issue that was coded in the first moment regards transnational justice and liability, more specifically the issue of accountability and prosecution. The rebel group questioned many of the positions and actions taken by Fujimori’s government. In one of the collected statements, the rebels question “what criteria is Fujimori developing? In the first place, he has covered up the genocide committed around the 1990 general elections, promoting impunity, and has not denounced the perpetrators or expressed his condemnation or demanded their punishment”. After the capture of Guzmán, a conflict resolution issue that was constantly relevant was the call for negotiations.
Type of conflict issues: *Conflict Goal Issues: *
Basic needs, Change economic system, Civil rights, Corruption, CPS: Socialist state, Economic reforms, Electoral fraud, Freedom of expression, Gender rights, Human rights, Labor rights, Land reforms, Opposition to elections, Oust full executive, Religious rights, Restructure military forces, Rule of law
*Conflict Dynamics Issues: * Atrocities and abuses, Collective targeting: ethnic, Collective targeting: political, DFI: Removal of foreign influence, IFI: Political support, IFI: Use of foreign influence, Military conduct, Release of prisoners
*Conflict Resolution Issues: * Accountability/prosecution/investigation, Amnesties, Call for negotiations, Call for truth and reconciliation processes
Annual information
This section contains annual information systematically collected by the UCDP.
1980
| Estimated Fatalities | |
|---|---|
| High | 0 |
| Best | 0 |
| Low | 0 |
Secondary Warring Support:
Side A (Government of Peru): n/a
Side B (Sendero Luminoso): n/a
1981
| Estimated Fatalities | |
|---|---|
| High | 1 |
| Best | 1 |
| Low | 0 |
Secondary Warring Support:
Side A (Government of Peru): n/a
Side B (Sendero Luminoso): n/a
1982
| Estimated Fatalities | |
|---|---|
| High | 25 |
| Best | 25 |
| Low | 0 |
Secondary Warring Support:
Side A (Government of Peru): n/a
Side B (Sendero Luminoso): n/a
1983
| Estimated Fatalities | |
|---|---|
| High | 1000 |
| Best | 1000 |
| Low | 0 |
Secondary Warring Support:
Side A (Government of Peru): n/a
Side B (Sendero Luminoso): n/a
1984
| Estimated Fatalities | |
|---|---|
| High | 1000 |
| Best | 1000 |
| Low | 0 |
Secondary Warring Support:
Side A (Government of Peru): n/a
Side B (Sendero Luminoso): n/a
1985
| Estimated Fatalities | |
|---|---|
| High | 1000 |
| Best | 1000 |
| Low | 0 |
Secondary Warring Support:
Side A (Government of Peru): n/a
Side B (Sendero Luminoso): n/a
1986
| Estimated Fatalities | |
|---|---|
| High | 25 |
| Best | 25 |
| Low | 0 |
Secondary Warring Support:
Side A (Government of Peru): n/a
Side B (Sendero Luminoso): n/a
1987
| Estimated Fatalities | |
|---|---|
| High | 25 |
| Best | 25 |
| Low | 0 |
Secondary Warring Support:
Side A (Government of Peru): n/a
Side B (Sendero Luminoso): n/a
1988
| Estimated Fatalities | |
|---|---|
| High | 1000 |
| Best | 1000 |
| Low | 0 |
Secondary Warring Support:
Side A (Government of Peru): n/a
Side B (Sendero Luminoso): n/a
1989
| Estimated Fatalities | |
|---|---|
| High | 1661 |
| Best | 1650 |
| Low | 1650 |
Secondary Warring Support:
Side A (Government of Peru): n/a
Side B (Sendero Luminoso): n/a
1990
| Estimated Fatalities | |
|---|---|
| High | 1052 |
| Best | 1052 |
| Low | 1052 |
Secondary Warring Support:
Side A (Government of Peru): n/a
Side B (Sendero Luminoso): n/a
1991
| Estimated Fatalities | |
|---|---|
| High | 1051 |
| Best | 1050 |
| Low | 1050 |
Secondary Warring Support:
Side A (Government of Peru): n/a
Side B (Sendero Luminoso): n/a
1992
| Estimated Fatalities | |
|---|---|
| High | 983 |
| Best | 981 |
| Low | 981 |
Secondary Warring Support:
Side A (Government of Peru): n/a
Side B (Sendero Luminoso): n/a
1993
| Estimated Fatalities | |
|---|---|
| High | 617 |
| Best | 612 |
| Low | 612 |
Secondary Warring Support:
Side A (Government of Peru): n/a
Side B (Sendero Luminoso): n/a
1994
| Estimated Fatalities | |
|---|---|
| High | 253 |
| Best | 253 |
| Low | 253 |
Secondary Warring Support:
Side A (Government of Peru): n/a
Side B (Sendero Luminoso): n/a
1995
| Estimated Fatalities | |
|---|---|
| High | 178 |
| Best | 178 |
| Low | 178 |
Secondary Warring Support:
Side A (Government of Peru): n/a
Side B (Sendero Luminoso): n/a
1996
| Estimated Fatalities | |
|---|---|
| High | 80 |
| Best | 80 |
| Low | 80 |
Secondary Warring Support:
Side A (Government of Peru): n/a
Side B (Sendero Luminoso): n/a
1997
| Estimated Fatalities | |
|---|---|
| High | 99 |
| Best | 93 |
| Low | 93 |
Secondary Warring Support:
Side A (Government of Peru): n/a
Side B (Sendero Luminoso): n/a
1998
| Estimated Fatalities | |
|---|---|
| High | 25 |
| Best | 25 |
| Low | 25 |
Secondary Warring Support:
Side A (Government of Peru): n/a
Side B (Sendero Luminoso): n/a
1999
| Estimated Fatalities | |
|---|---|
| High | 75 |
| Best | 75 |
| Low | 75 |
Secondary Warring Support:
Side A (Government of Peru): n/a
Side B (Sendero Luminoso): n/a
2000
| Estimated Fatalities | |
|---|---|
| High | 5 |
| Best | 5 |
| Low | 5 |
Secondary Warring Support:
Side A (Government of Peru): n/a
Side B (Sendero Luminoso): n/a
2001
| Estimated Fatalities | |
|---|---|
| High | 21 |
| Best | 21 |
| Low | 21 |
Secondary Warring Support:
Side A (Government of Peru): n/a
Side B (Sendero Luminoso): n/a
2002
| Estimated Fatalities | |
|---|---|
| High | 12 |
| Best | 12 |
| Low | 12 |
Secondary Warring Support:
Side A (Government of Peru): n/a
Side B (Sendero Luminoso): n/a
2003
| Estimated Fatalities | |
|---|---|
| High | 13 |
| Best | 13 |
| Low | 13 |
Secondary Warring Support:
Side A (Government of Peru): n/a
Side B (Sendero Luminoso): n/a
2004
| Estimated Fatalities | |
|---|---|
| High | 4 |
| Best | 3 |
| Low | 3 |
Secondary Warring Support:
Side A (Government of Peru): n/a
Side B (Sendero Luminoso): n/a
2006
| Estimated Fatalities | |
|---|---|
| High | 8 |
| Best | 8 |
| Low | 8 |
Secondary Warring Support:
Side A (Government of Peru): n/a
Side B (Sendero Luminoso): n/a
2007
| Estimated Fatalities | |
|---|---|
| High | 32 |
| Best | 32 |
| Low | 32 |
Secondary Warring Support:
Side A (Government of Peru): n/a
Side B (Sendero Luminoso): n/a
2008
| Estimated Fatalities | |
|---|---|
| High | 40 |
| Best | 40 |
| Low | 40 |
Secondary Warring Support:
Side A (Government of Peru): n/a
Side B (Sendero Luminoso): n/a
2009
| Estimated Fatalities | |
|---|---|
| High | 80 |
| Best | 50 |
| Low | 50 |
Secondary Warring Support:
Side A (Government of Peru): n/a
Side B (Sendero Luminoso): n/a
2010
| Estimated Fatalities | |
|---|---|
| High | 28 |
| Best | 28 |
| Low | 28 |
Secondary Warring Support:
Side A (Government of Peru): n/a
Side B (Sendero Luminoso): n/a
2011
| Estimated Fatalities | |
|---|---|
| High | 14 |
| Best | 12 |
| Low | 12 |
Secondary Warring Support:
Side A (Government of Peru): n/a
Side B (Sendero Luminoso): n/a
2013
| Estimated Fatalities | |
|---|---|
| High | 3 |
| Best | 3 |
| Low | 3 |
Secondary Warring Support:
Side A (Government of Peru): n/a
Side B (Sendero Luminoso): n/a
2014
| Estimated Fatalities | |
|---|---|
| High | 6 |
| Best | 6 |
| Low | 6 |
Secondary Warring Support:
Side A (Government of Peru): n/a
Side B (Sendero Luminoso): n/a
2015
| Estimated Fatalities | |
|---|---|
| High | 9 |
| Best | 9 |
| Low | 9 |
Secondary Warring Support:
Side A (Government of Peru): n/a
Side B (Sendero Luminoso): n/a
2016
| Estimated Fatalities | |
|---|---|
| High | 10 |
| Best | 10 |
| Low | 10 |
Secondary Warring Support:
Side A (Government of Peru): n/a
Side B (Sendero Luminoso): n/a
2017
| Estimated Fatalities | |
|---|---|
| High | 7 |
| Best | 7 |
| Low | 7 |
Secondary Warring Support:
Side A (Government of Peru): n/a
Side B (Sendero Luminoso): n/a
2021
| Estimated Fatalities | |
|---|---|
| High | 20 |
| Best | 20 |
| Low | 20 |
Secondary Warring Support:
Side A (Government of Peru): n/a
Side B (Sendero Luminoso): n/a
2022
| Estimated Fatalities | |
|---|---|
| High | 13 |
| Best | 13 |
| Low | 13 |
Secondary Warring Support:
Side A (Government of Peru): n/a
Side B (Sendero Luminoso): n/a
2023
| Estimated Fatalities | |
|---|---|
| High | 12 |
| Best | 12 |
| Low | 12 |
Secondary Warring Support:
Side A (Government of Peru): n/a
Side B (Sendero Luminoso): n/a
2024
| Estimated Fatalities | |
|---|---|
| High | 0 |
| Best | 0 |
| Low | 0 |
Secondary Warring Support:
Side A (Government of Peru): n/a
Side B (Sendero Luminoso): n/a
Dyad Archive
This section contains annual information no longer systematically collected by the UCDP.
1980 Dyad Archive
Terminated: NO
1981 Dyad Archive
Negotiations: YES
Victory: YES
Terminated: NO
1982 Dyad Archive
Comment on Yearly Battle Related Deaths: The estimates are based on official figures of deaths attributed to Sendero and counter-Sendero activities in the country. It has been difficult to find neutral accounts of deaths in the conflict.
Comment on Active: The guerrilla activity of Sendero Luminoso in 1982 escalated into an armed conflict. Based around Ayacucho and operating mainly in the south-central Andeans, its activities were focused on establishing control of rural areas, attacking and driving out government and security forces.
Negotiations: NO
Victory: NO
Terminated: NO
1983 Dyad Archive
Comment on Yearly Battle Related Deaths: The estimates are based on official figures of deaths attributed to Sendero and counter-Sendero activities in the country. It has been difficult to find neutral accounts of deaths in the conflict.
Comment on Active: Fighting between Sendero Luminoso and the government escalated during 1983. On 30 May, President Belaúnde declared a nationwide state of emergency. The violence mainly took place in Ayacucho and surrounding areas. The guerrilla campaign was further intensified during municipal elections in November. There were also reports in 1983 of attacks made by Sendero Luminoso on Bolivian territory.
Negotiations: NO
Comment on Negotiations: At the end of the year, it was reported that Sendero Luminoso had announced a two-year truce; however, this was broken almost immediately by the guerrillas themselves.
Victory: NO
Terminated: NO
1984 Dyad Archive
Comment on Yearly Battle Related Deaths: It has been difficult to find neutral accounts of deaths in the conflict, hence the estimates are based on official figures.
Comment on Active: The intensity of the conflict had reportedly declined somewhat since municipal elections in late 1983. In June 1984, however, the guerrillas launched a new offensive in Ayacucho. In response to this new offensive, the armed forces were given charge of planning, directing and conducting the counterinsurgent campaign (previously, most of the responsibility had been with the security forces). During the second half of the year, Sendero Luminoso shifted some of its activity to the coca-growing areas in the north-eastern jungle region, but analysts claimed there was no close collaboration between the guerrillas and drug traffickers.
Negotiations: NO
Comment on Negotiations: In early 1984, the two largest opposition parties, the United Left and the American Popular Revolutionary Alliance, attempted to organise meetings between the rebels and officials in Ayacucho; however, the initiative was cancelled for security reasons.
Victory: NO
Terminated: NO
1985 Dyad Archive
Comment on Yearly Battle Related Deaths: It has been difficult to find neutral accounts of deaths in the conflict, hence the estimates are based on official figures.
Negotiations: NO
Comment on Negotiations: In February, the Pope visited Peru. During a visit to Ayacucho, he urged the guerrillas to change their strategy to a peaceful one and to adopt negotiation rather than armed struggle. However, Sendero Luminoso responded by a major sabotage of electric facilities in Lima at the same time that the Pope landed there.
Victory: NO
Terminated: NO
1986 Dyad Archive
Comment on Yearly Battle Related Deaths: It has been difficult to find neutral accounts of deaths in the conflict. Hence, the estimates are to a large part based on official figures.
Comment on Active: As Sendero Luminoso’s stronghold in the central Andes came increasingly under the control of the armed forces, the guerrillas in 1986 increasingly focused their activities on urban areas, including Lima. The rural offensive, meanwhile, extended as far as the borders with Ecuador in the north and Bolivia in the south. In the second half of 1986, the intensity of the conflict declined; the guerrilla activity mainly took the form of selective assassinations.
Negotiations: NO
Victory: NO
Terminated: NO
1987 Dyad Archive
Comment on Yearly Battle Related Deaths: It has been difficult to find neutral accounts of deaths in the conflict. Hence, the estimates are to a large part based on official figures.
Negotiations: NO
Victory: NO
Terminated: NO
1988 Dyad Archive
Comment on Yearly Battle Related Deaths: It has been difficult to find neutral accounts of deaths in the conflict. The estimates are thus based on official figures.
Comment on Active: In 1988, the government repeatedly renewed the state of emergency and extended it to new regions. The measures were in response to escalating guerrilla violence, and the success on behalf of Sendero Luminoso in extending activities to urban centres. In July, the group’s leader Abimael Guzmán gave an interview for the first time since the beginning of the conflict, affirming the group’s intention to continue the armed struggle until the government was defeated.
Negotiations: NO
Victory: NO
Terminated: NO
1989 Dyad Archive
Negotiations: NO
Victory: NO
Terminated: NO
1990 Dyad Archive
Negotiations: NO
Victory: NO
Terminated: NO
1991 Dyad Archive
Negotiations: NO
Victory: NO
Terminated: NO
1992 Dyad Archive
Negotiations: NO
Victory: NO
Terminated: NO
1993 Dyad Archive
Negotiations: NO
Victory: NO
Terminated: NO
1994 Dyad Archive
Negotiations: NO
Victory: NO
Terminated: NO
1995 Dyad Archive
Negotiations: NO
Victory: NO
Terminated: NO
1996 Dyad Archive
Negotiations: NO
Victory: NO
Terminated: NO
1997 Dyad Archive
Negotiations: NO
Victory: NO
Terminated: NO
1998 Dyad Archive
Negotiations: NO
Victory: NO
Terminated: NO
1999 Dyad Archive
Comment on Active: Feliciano was captured and placed in prison on 14 July.
Negotiations: NO
Victory: NO
Terminated: NO
2000 Dyad Archive
Negotiations: NO
Victory: NO
Terminated: NO
2001 Dyad Archive
Negotiations: NO
Victory: NO
Terminated: NO
2002 Dyad Archive
Negotiations: NO
Victory: NO
Terminated: NO
2003 Dyad Archive
Negotiations: NO
Victory: NO
Terminated: NO
2004 Dyad Archive
Comment on Active: Continued low activity. Four battle related deaths this year.
Negotiations: NO
Victory: NO
Terminated: NO
2006 Dyad Archive
Negotiations: NO
Victory: NO
Terminated: NO
2007 Dyad Archive
Comment on Active: The hardliners led by Alipio in Apurímac-Ene River Valleys (VRAE) and Artemio faction in Huallaga valley have since the of 2004 planned a joint flowering of the revolution of Sendero Luminoso to take place between 2006 and 2008. 2005 saw an upswing in activity, in 2006 it decreased and in 2007 the conflict became active again for the first time since 1999. SL is benefiting from other social movements, mainly consisting of coca growers, opposing the governments anti-narcotics strategy.
Negotiations: NO
Victory: NO
Terminated: NO
2008 Dyad Archive
Comment on Active: Since the conflict became active again in 2007, the hardliners led by Artemio in the VRAE region in Ayacucho has increased its activity in 2008.
Negotiations: NO
Victory: NO
Terminated: NO
2009 Dyad Archive
Comment on Active: The dyad continued to be active in the Upper Huallaga Valley under the command of “Comrade Artemio” and in the Apurímac-Ene River Valley (VRAE) under “Comrade José”.
Negotiations: NO
Victory: NO
Terminated: NO
2010 Dyad Archive
Comment on Active: The conflict continued to be active mainly in the Apurímac-Ene River Valley (VRAE) region and with decreased activity compared to 2009.
Negotiations: NO
Victory: NO
Terminated: YES
Type of termination: No or Low Activity
Date of termination: 2010-12-31
2011 Dyad Archive
Comment on Active: Comrade Artemio, leader of the Sendero Luminoso fraction active in Upper Huallaga Valley, declared a military truce and announced that Sendero Luminoso would continue its political struggle.
Negotiations: NO
Comment on Negotiations: On 7 December 2011 Sendero Luminoso’s leader Comrade Artemio announced that the armed struggle was over, but the political struggle would continue. Artemio proposed a "military truce" with the government to open the way for negotiations.
Victory: NO
Terminated: NO
2013 Dyad Archive
Negotiations: NO
Victory: NO
Terminated: NO
2014 Dyad Archive
Negotiations: NO
Victory: NO
Terminated: NO
2015 Dyad Archive
Terminated: NO
2016 Dyad Archive
Terminated: NO
2017 Dyad Archive
Terminated: NO
2021 Dyad Archive
Terminated: NO
2022 Dyad Archive
Terminated: NO
2023 Dyad Archive
Terminated: NO
2024 Dyad Archive
Terminated: NO