General information
Part of Conflict: Colombia: Government
Date of first stated goals of incompatibility: 1965-07-17
Comment on date of first stated goal of incompatibility: Internal ideological discrepancies within the PCC (Communist Party of Colombia) ended in the division of the political party and the creation of the PCML (Communist Party of Colombia Marxist Leninist) in the mid 1960s. Like the ELN, the EPL was formed by a group of students and once created the group declared itself the military wing of the PCML. It is not until April 1967 that the first armed front is created.
Date of first use of armed force: 1968-01-06
Comment on date of first use of armed force: The first recorded armed encounter between governmental armed forces and the opposition organisation occurred on 6 January 1968. The combat held in the town of Ure resulted in 2 policemen killed.
First Battle Related Death: 1968-01-06
Comment on First Battle Related Death: The first recorded armed encounter between governmental armed forces and the opposition organisation occurred on 6 January 1968. The combat held in the town of Ure resulted in 2 policemen killed.
Date when dyad reached 25 battle releated deaths: 1984-12-31
Comment on date when dyad reached 25 battle related deaths: Several attacks involving EPL occured, first and foremost, in the early months of 1984 reaching more than 25 battle related deaths in total.
Conflict issues
Conflict Goal Issues: EPL (Ejército Popular de Liberación; Popular Liberation Army) was a socialist, Marxist-Leninist rebel group founded in 1967 as an armed branch of the Communist Party of Colombia (Marxist-Leninist), itself an offshoot of the Columbian Communist Party. The group sought to transform Colombia into a socialist state. Most of EPL’s members demobilized following the 1991 peace agreement, forming the Hope, Peace and Liberty (Esperanza, Paz y Libertad) party. The first conflict goal issues located by the project was in a joint declaration together with three other Latin American Marxist-Leninist groups, on 30 September 1978. Some of the central issues raised in the declaration was that the correct path forward could only come through “the authentic liberation and independence of our peoples, popular democracy and socialism”. They also stressed the importance of changing the economic system and foreign policy, stating that any alliance with any great power “would in fact lead us to support and consolidate the exploitation exercised by that superpower (…)”. This reflected an anti-imperialist attitude which attributed much of the blame for the nation’s poverty to foreign exploitation. Generally, based on the statements found by the project, EPL continued to pursue most of the same conflict goal issues throughout the coded conflict-issue years. Issues did change in specifics or in rhetoric but remained consistent in the overarching critique, for example focusing less on imperialism and more on the influence of foreign capital. The EPL’s main conflict goal issues were implementing democracy and socialism, civil rights, and economic and foreign policy reform. These issues were all consistently repeated and received heavy emphasis throughout the coded period.
Conflict Dynamics Issues: The first conflict dynamics issues that the project found to have been raised by the EPL concerned decreasing foreign involvement, seeking both decreased foreign influence and withdrawal of foreign financial support to the government, specifically directed towards North America and the US. In the 1978 joint declaration, the group states that, “The US monopolies directly exploit the various branches of the economy of our countries”. The EPL are coded only as having raised a handful of conflict dynamics issues. At the same time, the group remained consistent and did not make substantial changes to their stance on those few issues that were raised. They consistently reiterated their stance on foreign involvement with criticism leveled specifically at the United States involvement, though they also did on occasion ask for help from outside actors like the International Red Cross, the Catholic church and later, the Venezuelan government. EPL’s main conflict dynamics issue was decreased foreign involvement. In particular, the removal of North American/US was the especially emphasized, frequently and continuously being mentioned in statements by the group.
Conflict Resolution Issues: The EPL first raised a conflict resolution issue with a call for negotiation in 1978, affirming a belief that the issues raised in the declarations could be resolved through negotiations by stating, “Currently, we propose that these problems should be dealt with through talks and negotiations”. Over time, the EPL mostly continued calling for negotiations, ceasefires, and national dialogue. However, they did voice opposition to negotiations and dialogue in select instances such as when the peace process failed in 1990, after which they commented, “As we can see, the peace process has been a failure and has certainly contributed to the strengthening of militarism and fascism”. Of the conflict resolution issues raised by the EPL, calls for negotiations would qualify best as the group’s main conflict resolution issue as it was the most frequently, most emphasized raised issue and was continually brough up over the course of the conflict.
Type of conflict issues: Conflict Goal Issues: Basic needs, Change economic system, Civil rights, Constitutional issues, Corruption, CPS: Democracy, CPS: Socialist state, Cultural rights, Disband para-military forces, Economic reforms, Foreign policy reform, Human rights, Labor rights, Law and order, Oust full executive, Protection of natural resources/the environment, Public services, Restructure military forces, Revenues from natural resources
Conflict Dynamics Issues: Atrocities and abuses, DFI: Removal of foreign influence, DFI: Withdrawal of financial support, IFI: Foreign mediator, IFI: Political support, Military conduct, Release of prisoners
Conflict Resolution Issues: Accountability/prosecution/investigation, Call for ceasefire, Call for negotiations, National dialogue, Opposition to negotiations, Structure of negotiations
Annual information
This section contains annual information systematically collected by the UCDP.
1984
| Estimated Fatalities | |
|---|---|
| High | 25 |
| Best | 25 |
| Low | 0 |
Secondary Warring Support:
Side A (Government of Colombia): n/a
Side B (EPL): n/a
Peace agreements
Name of peace agreement: Acuerdo entre el Gobierno y el Movimiento 19 de Abril (M-19) y el Partido Comunista De Colombia (M-L) y su organización guerrillera, Ejército Popular de Liberación (EPL) ("Acuerdos de Corinto")
Date when warring parties signed the agreement: 1984-08-24
Comment of peace agreement: Peace process agreement
The agreement provided for a ceasefire to start on 30 August 1984.
The most essential part of the agreement was the establishment of a national dialogue in which the different forces of the country were allowed to participate with full representation. The national dialogue would address central issues such as democratic development of political, economic and social reforms that the country required. It would also address institutional, agrarian, labor and urban, justice, education, university, health, public services and economic development.
Regarding the incompatibility, this agreement initiated steps toward potential political and social reform.
Signatories: Por La Comisión De Negociación Y Diálogo: Bernardo Ramírez - Alfonso Gómez Gómez - Horacio Serpa Uribe - Abel Rodríguez - Enrique Santos - Laura Restrepo.
Por El Movimiento 19 De Abril, M-19: Iván Marino Ospina - Álvaro Fayad - Carlos Pizarro - Antonio Navarro - Luis Otero - Gustavo Londoño - Germán Rojas Niño - Otti Patiño - Marco Antonio Chalita - Julia Jiménez.
Comment of signatories: Dyadic peace agreement signed in Corinto, Nicaragua on 24 August 1984.
The agreement did not include the ELN or FARC.
Ended: True
Date agreement ended: 1985-11-30
Comment of Duration: On 30th November the EPL declared that the cease-fire and truce to which it had agreed in 1984 with the Betancur government officially broken. An EPL communique said that "the fascists have broken the truce and killed our representatives to the so-called peace, dialogue and verification commission".
Full-text peace agreement
1987
| Estimated Fatalities | |
|---|---|
| High | 25 |
| Best | 25 |
| Low | 0 |
Secondary Warring Support:
Side A (Government of Colombia): n/a
Side B (EPL): n/a
1988
| Estimated Fatalities | |
|---|---|
| High | 25 |
| Best | 25 |
| Low | 0 |
Secondary Warring Support:
Side A (Government of Colombia): n/a
Side B (EPL): n/a
1989
| Estimated Fatalities | |
|---|---|
| High | 33 |
| Best | 33 |
| Low | 33 |
Secondary Warring Support:
Side A (Government of Colombia): n/a
Side B (EPL): n/a
1990
| Estimated Fatalities | |
|---|---|
| High | 35 |
| Best | 35 |
| Low | 35 |
Secondary Warring Support:
Side A (Government of Colombia): n/a
Side B (EPL): n/a
Peace agreements
Name of peace agreement: Acuerdo Gobierno Nacional - Ejécito Popular de Liberacion, Pueblo Nuevo y Juan José
Date when warring parties signed the agreement: 1990-08-26
Comment of peace agreement: Partial peace agreement
This agreement between the Government of Colombia and EPL regulated the conflict by allocating EPL forces to nine camps and stipulating their consolidation within two months to seven camps. The government was to service the camps.
With regard to the incompatibility, the agreement aimed to create conditions that would facilitate EPL's participation in the National Constitutional Assembly which would meet the following year to reform the constitution. The ultimate aim of the agreement was to reach a political solution to the conflict and to allow EPL to join the political process and region civil life.
The agreement also provided for the creation of four bilateral commissions, to have join Government and EPL composition, to address political aspects, regional processes and development plans, factors of violence, and a permanent commission.
Signatories: Por el Gobierno Nacional
JESÚS ANTONIO BEJARANO Consejero Presidencial REYNALDO GARY
Consejería CARLOS EDUARDO JARA MILLO Asesor Consejería TOMAS CONCHA S. Sec. Integración Popular
Por el Ejército Popular de Ltberación
BERNARDO GUTIÉRREZ Mando Central MARCOS JARA Comandante Estado Mayor Central ANÍBAL PALACIO Partido Comunista de Colombia (M-L)
Comment of signatories: Dyadic peace agreement signed on 26 August 1990 after meetings in Pueblo Nuevo and Juan Jose.
The agreement did not include other opposition groups active in Colombia, including ELN, FARC, or M-19.
Comment of Duration: The agreement was followed by negotiations.
Full-text peace agreement
Name of peace agreement: Acuerdo entre el PCC M-L, EPL, Quintín Lame y PRT y Partidos Políticos Signatarios del Acuerdo Para la Constituyente
Date when warring parties signed the agreement: 1990-09-24
Comment of peace agreement: Peace Process Agreement
This agreement reaffirms previous agreements and continues the process of facilitating political solutions to the conflict. The parties express their encouragement for other groups to strive for involvement in the constitutional assembly, and propose new topics as possible opportunities to expand the agreement.
The MAQL state that they will not participate in the dialogue process without special participation provisions for the indigenous movement in the constitution.
Signatories: Por el Movimiento de Salvacion Nacional: RODRIGO MARIN BERNAL. Por el Partido Social Conservador: DIEGO PARDO KOPPEL. Por la Alianza Democrática M-19: DIEGO MONTÑA CUELLAR, CAMILO GONZALEZ, JAMIE FAJARDO, OTTO ÑAÑEZ.
Por el Mando Central del EPL, BERNARDO GUTiERREZ, OCTAVIO HERNANDEZ, CARLOS ALBERTO RESTREPO Y JAIRO MORALES. Por la direccion nacional del PRT: SERGIO SIERRA Y VÍCTOR CRUZ. Por el Estado Mayor del Quintín Lame: LEONARDO ULCUÉ, MAURICIO PAEZ.
Por el Partido Comunista Marxista-Leninista: JORGE OCAMPO Y RAÚL TEJADA
Comment of signatories: Dyadic peace agreement signed in Labores on 24 September 1990.
The agreement did not include other opposition groups active in Colombia, including ELN, FARC, or M-19.
Full-text peace agreement
Name of peace agreement: Acuerdo Gobierno Nacional-EPL y PCC – ML, Labores, Belmira, Antioquia
Date when warring parties signed the agreement: 1990-09-28
Comment of peace agreement: Peace Process Agreement
This agreement reaffirms and specifies modalities for implementation of the 26 August 1990 agreement. The agreement states that EPL forces have been concentrated in 10 camps and that the government is responsible for regulation of these camps.
With regard to the incompatibility, the agreement states that the parties will work toward facilitating the EPL's involvement in the National Constitutional Assembly.
The agreement identifies individuals to serve on three of the four commissions outlined in the 26 August agreement: political aspects, regional processes and development plans, and factors of violence and human rights. The government is tasked with facilitating meetings regarding the expansion of the agreement and furtherance of the peace process, including for participation of other social and political sectors. A commission is formed to effect major changes in the negotiating conditions to energize the process.
Signatories: Por el Gobierno Nacional.
JESÚS ANTONIO BEJARANO
Consejero Presidencial
CARLOS EDUARDO JARAMILLO
Asesor Consejería
REYNALDOGARY
Asesor Consejería
Por el EPL. BERNARDO GUTIÉRREZ Mando Central JAIRO MORALES Mando Central
Por el PCC (M-L)
ANÍBAL PALACIO
Comment of signatories: Dyadic peace agreement signed in Labores on 28 September 1990.
The agreement did not include other opposition groups active in Colombia, including ELN, FARC, or M-19.
Full-text peace agreement
1991
| Estimated Fatalities | |
|---|---|
| High | 0 |
| Best | 0 |
| Low | 0 |
Secondary Warring Support:
Side A (Government of Colombia): n/a
Side B (EPL): n/a
Peace agreements
Name of peace agreement: Declaración del Gobierno Nacional y el PCC (ML) y el EPL, Juan José, Córdoba
Date when warring parties signed the agreement: 1991-01-29
Comment of peace agreement: Partial peace agreement
At the IV Conference of Combatants, the parties agreed to surrender arms on 1 March 1991 and to do so in camps set up for EPL combatants. A bilateral commission was appointed to prepare a draft of the definitive agreement.
Regarding the incompatibility, individuals are appointed to represent EPL in the National Constitutional Assembly, first as spokespeople and subsequently as full representatives after the surrender of arms.
Signatories: For the EPL and the PCC - ML:
JAIME FAJARDO LANDAETA
DA RÍO ANTONIO MEJÍA
ANÍBAL PALACIO
FERNANDO PINEDA
BERNARDO GUTIÉRREZ
MARCOS JARA
DOMINGO ROJAS
JYMY SALCEDO
JAIME VELASQUEZ
CAMILOSANTACRUZ
SALOMÓN BORGES
For the Presidential Council
JESÚS A. BEJARANO A.
CARLOS EDUARDO JARA MILLO
ALVARO HERNANDEZ
TOMAS CONCHA SANZ
Comment of signatories: Dyadic peace agreement signed in Juan Jose on 29 January 1991.
The agreement did not include other opposition groups active in Colombia, including ELN, FARC, or M-19.
Comment of third parties role in peace agreement: Agreement is not signed by, but is stated in the text to be held in the presence of Manuel Medina, representative of the Spanish Socialist Workers’ Party (Partido Socialista Obrero Español, PSOE) and Socialist International in his capacity as international monitor, Monsignor Flavio Calle, Bishop of Montelíbano and Monsignor Guillermo Vega of the Colombian Episcopal Conference, as representatives of the church and as moral tutors of the peace process, Monsignor Emilio Stehle special guest of the church, Senator Rodrigo Marín Bernal in representation of the National Salvation Movement and Member of Parliament Andrés López.
Full-text peace agreement
Name of peace agreement: Acuerdo Final Gobierno Nacional-Ejército Popular De Liberación
Date when warring parties signed the agreement: 1991-02-15
Comment of peace agreement: Full peace agreement
An agreement was signed on 15 February 1991, between the government of Colombia and the EPL guerilla.
The agreement stipulated the complete disarmament of the EPL rebels, and their integration into civilian life. The agreement included an extensive security plan, with the aim of securing the health and lives of the former EPL combatants and leaders.
The main provision of the agreement was the transformation of EPL into a legal political party, and the granting of two seats in the assembly to be used by the group.
The agreement created a number of commission and committees, such as a commission to spread the truth about the conflict both nationally and internationally, a commission for the investigation of violent crimes committed during the conflict and a commission for the promulgation of the contents of the peace agreement.
A decree pardoning EPL guerrillas who wished to be reintegrated into civilian life was approved by the government on 22 January; it also covered the Revolutionary Workers Party (PRT), which was to lay down its arms on 26 January.
Signatories: For the government: Humberto de la Calle Lombana Jesus A. Bejarano Avila Carlos Eduardo Jaramillo C. Alvaro Hernandez V. Tomas Concha Sanz Gabriel Restrepo Forero Gonzalo de Francisco Zambrano
For the EPL: Jaime Fajardo Anibal Palacio Luis Fernando Pineda Bernardo Gutierrez Julio Morales Marcos Jara
Witnesses Guillermo Vega Manuel Medina
Comment of signatories: Dyadic peace agreement
The agreement was signed in Bogota
Comment of Duration: On 4 March 1991 the Hope, Peace and Liberty (Esperanza, Paz y Libertad - EPL) political party was formed.
Full-text peace agreement
Name of peace agreement: Caracas Agenda
Date when warring parties signed the agreement: 1991-06-06
Comment of peace agreement: Peace process agreement
This agreement lays out issues to be discussed by parties in future peace negotiations. It prioritizes the need to reach a ceasefire. Other issues highlighted for discussion include measures against impunity, to protect human rights, and political participation for armed groups.
Signatories: On behalf of the government:
Jesús Antonio Bejarano A. Presidential Adviser Andrés González D. Vice-Minister for the Interior Carlos Eduardo Jaramillo C. Adviser to the Peace Council Humberto Vergara P. Adviser to the Peace Council Tomás Concha S. Adviser to the Peace Council Reynaldo Gary P. Adviser to the Commission
On behalf of the Simón Bolívar Guerrilla Coordination Body
Alfonso Cano (FARC), Iván Márquez (FARC), Pablo Catatumbo (FARC), Humberto Zulanga (FARC), Daniel Aldana (FARC), Miguel Suárez (FARC), Andrés París (FARC), Francisco Galán (ELN), Lucía González (ELN), Diego Ruiz (EPL), Asdrúbal Jiménez (EPL)
Comment of signatories: Comprehensive Peace Agreement signed in Caracas Venezuela on 6 June 1991.
Third parties: Observers present:
Miguel Motta C., Rafael Serrano P., María Cristina Ocampo, Henry Millán, William Ramírez, Oscar Reyes, Jesús Carvajal, Alvaro Vásquez, Hernán Motta, Nelson Berrío
Ended: True
Date agreement ended: 1992-03-31
Comment of Duration: Four rounds of talks were held between the parties from June to November 1991 but clashes and attacks on Colombian infrastructure continued. In March 1992 a new roand of talks were held in Mexico but it broke down due to EPL's kidnapping of the former Liberal minister Argelino Durán Quintero and the disappearance and death of Daniel García, diplomatic emissary for the FARC. On 31 March 1992 President Cesar Gaviria and his peace process advisers announced that as long as the rebels continued their dynamite attacks, kidnappings and violence, there would be no more talks with FARC or ELN
On 28 May, President César Gaviria Trujillo stated that he had virtually ruled out any possibility of reaching an agreement with the guerrillas, and that the actions of the armed forces were aimed at "wiping them out".
Full-text peace agreement
1993
| Estimated Fatalities | |
|---|---|
| High | 0 |
| Best | 0 |
| Low | 0 |
Secondary Warring Support:
Side A (Government of Colombia): n/a
Side B (EPL): n/a
1994
| Estimated Fatalities | |
|---|---|
| High | 0 |
| Best | 0 |
| Low | 0 |
Secondary Warring Support:
Side A (Government of Colombia): n/a
Side B (EPL): n/a
1996
| Estimated Fatalities | |
|---|---|
| High | 0 |
| Best | 0 |
| Low | 0 |
Secondary Warring Support:
Side A (Government of Colombia): n/a
Side B (EPL): n/a
1997
| Estimated Fatalities | |
|---|---|
| High | 0 |
| Best | 0 |
| Low | 0 |
Secondary Warring Support:
Side A (Government of Colombia): n/a
Side B (EPL): n/a
1998
| Estimated Fatalities | |
|---|---|
| High | 0 |
| Best | 0 |
| Low | 0 |
Secondary Warring Support:
Side A (Government of Colombia): n/a
Side B (EPL): n/a
2000
| Estimated Fatalities | |
|---|---|
| High | 0 |
| Best | 0 |
| Low | 0 |
Secondary Warring Support:
Side A (Government of Colombia): n/a
Side B (EPL): n/a
2001
| Estimated Fatalities | |
|---|---|
| High | 0 |
| Best | 0 |
| Low | 0 |
Secondary Warring Support:
Side A (Government of Colombia): n/a
Side B (EPL): n/a
2002
| Estimated Fatalities | |
|---|---|
| High | 0 |
| Best | 0 |
| Low | 0 |
Secondary Warring Support:
Side A (Government of Colombia): n/a
Side B (EPL): n/a
2003
| Estimated Fatalities | |
|---|---|
| High | 0 |
| Best | 0 |
| Low | 0 |
Secondary Warring Support:
Side A (Government of Colombia): n/a
Side B (EPL): n/a
2004
| Estimated Fatalities | |
|---|---|
| High | 0 |
| Best | 0 |
| Low | 0 |
Secondary Warring Support:
Side A (Government of Colombia): n/a
Side B (EPL): n/a
2005
| Estimated Fatalities | |
|---|---|
| High | 0 |
| Best | 0 |
| Low | 0 |
Secondary Warring Support:
Side A (Government of Colombia): n/a
Side B (EPL): n/a
2006
| Estimated Fatalities | |
|---|---|
| High | 0 |
| Best | 0 |
| Low | 0 |
Secondary Warring Support:
Side A (Government of Colombia): n/a
Side B (EPL): n/a
2007
| Estimated Fatalities | |
|---|---|
| High | 0 |
| Best | 0 |
| Low | 0 |
Secondary Warring Support:
Side A (Government of Colombia): n/a
Side B (EPL): n/a
2015
| Estimated Fatalities | |
|---|---|
| High | 0 |
| Best | 0 |
| Low | 0 |
Secondary Warring Support:
Side A (Government of Colombia): n/a
Side B (EPL): n/a
2016
| Estimated Fatalities | |
|---|---|
| High | 0 |
| Best | 0 |
| Low | 0 |
Secondary Warring Support:
Side A (Government of Colombia): n/a
Side B (EPL): n/a
2019
| Estimated Fatalities | |
|---|---|
| High | 0 |
| Best | 0 |
| Low | 0 |
Secondary Warring Support:
Side A (Government of Colombia): n/a
Side B (EPL): n/a
Dyad Archive
This section contains annual information no longer systematically collected by the UCDP.
1984 Dyad Archive
Negotiations: YES
Comment on Negotiations: The negotiations with the government resulted in a peace process agreement signed on 24 August 1984, The most essential part of the agreement, was the setting up of a major national dialogue in which the different forces of the country was allowed to participate, with full representation The national dialogue would cover central issues such as democratic development of reforms policies, economic and social that the country requires and demands relating to institutional, agrarian, labor and urban, justice, education, university, health, public services and economic development. However no commitments were made of the guerrilla groups to disarm.
Victory: NO
Terminated: YES
Type of termination: Peace Agreement
Date of termination: 1984-08-24
Comment on Termination: A peace process agreement was signed between the government of Colombia and EPL and M19 on 24 August 1984.
1987 Dyad Archive
Negotiations: NO
Comment on Negotiations: No record of negotiations in researched year
Victory: NO
Terminated: NO
1988 Dyad Archive
Negotiations: NO
Comment on Negotiations: No record of negotiations in researched year
Victory: NO
Terminated: NO
1989 Dyad Archive
Negotiations: NO
Comment on Negotiations: The EPL, although being part of the CNGSB, continued military operations until early May when it decided to join FARCs ceasefire proposal. The truce was respected for several months. The truce and attempts to negotiate were withdrawn on December after some clashes with the government took place.
Victory: NO
Terminated: NO
1990 Dyad Archive
Negotiations: YES
Comment on Negotiations: The EPL joined negotiations that were taking place. They participated as a political party for the elections for the Constitutional Assembly under the name of EPL Esperanza, Paz y Libertad -Hope, Peace and Liberty. The first rough agreement was made public after a meeting on 23 May. on 9 June a joint communique was issued on the EPL's reincorporation into civilian life. The signatories for the two sides were presidential peace adviser Rafael Pardo Rueda and his assistants, and Bernardo Gutierrez and Julio Morales for the EPL central command. Under the terms of the commmunique EPL would report to established locations in the department and release prisoners before next meeting. A joint working commission was also established to implement the peace plan. Negotiations continued in July over demobilisation, disarmament and the conversion of the EPL into a political party,
An important faction of the EPL, supported by Francisco Caraballo (Secretary General of the Marxist-Leninist Communist Party), stated that it would not join the agreement and that it would continue fighting the government.
Victory: NO
Terminated: YES
Type of termination: Peace Agreement
Date of termination: 1990-09-28
Comment on Termination: The government and EPL signed three partial peace agreements in 1990 and a final on 15 February 1991.
Comment on Termination Date: on 28 September 1990 the government and EPL singed "Acuerdo Gobierno Nacional-EPL y PCC – ML, Labores, Belmira, Antioquia".
1991 Dyad Archive
Negotiations: YES
Comment on Negotiations: A preliminary peace agreement was signed on 7 January. The agreement applied to 1000 or 2000 armed men of the EPL.
Terminated: NO
1993 Dyad Archive
Terminated: NO
1994 Dyad Archive
Terminated: NO
1996 Dyad Archive
Terminated: NO
1997 Dyad Archive
Terminated: NO
1998 Dyad Archive
Terminated: NO
2000 Dyad Archive
Terminated: NO
2001 Dyad Archive
Terminated: NO
2002 Dyad Archive
Terminated: NO
2003 Dyad Archive
Terminated: NO
2004 Dyad Archive
Negotiations: NO
Victory: NO
Terminated: NO
2005 Dyad Archive
Negotiations: NO
Victory: NO
Terminated: NO
2006 Dyad Archive
Negotiations: NO
Victory: NO
Terminated: NO
2007 Dyad Archive
Negotiations: NO
Victory: NO
Terminated: NO
2015 Dyad Archive
Terminated: NO
2016 Dyad Archive
Terminated: NO
2019 Dyad Archive
Terminated: NO
