General information
Part of Conflict: n/a
First Battle Related Death: 2016-01-04
Date when dyad reached 25 battle releated deaths: 2016-06-04
Comment on date when dyad reached 25 battle related deaths: The non-state conflict between Deebam and NDV is first included in UCDP data in 2016. In June of that year, clashes between the two groups had resulted in more than 25 battle-related deaths.
Conflict issues
Annual information
This section contains annual information systematically collected by the UCDP.
2003
| Estimated Fatalities | |
|---|---|
| High | 0 |
| Best | 0 |
| Low | 0 |
Secondary Warring Support:
Side A (Deebam): n/a
Side B (NDV): n/a
2016
| Estimated Fatalities | |
|---|---|
| High | 34 |
| Best | 26 |
| Low | 26 |
Secondary Warring Support:
Side A (Deebam): n/a
Side B (NDV): n/a
2017
| Estimated Fatalities | |
|---|---|
| High | 47 |
| Best | 44 |
| Low | 44 |
Secondary Warring Support:
Side A (Deebam): n/a
Side B (NDV): n/a
2019
| Estimated Fatalities | |
|---|---|
| High | 48 |
| Best | 43 |
| Low | 26 |
Secondary Warring Support:
Side A (Deebam): n/a
Side B (NDV): n/a
2020
| Estimated Fatalities | |
|---|---|
| High | 18 |
| Best | 15 |
| Low | 15 |
Secondary Warring Support:
Side A (Deebam): n/a
Side B (NDV): n/a
2022
| Estimated Fatalities | |
|---|---|
| High | 5 |
| Best | 5 |
| Low | 5 |
Secondary Warring Support:
Side A (Deebam): n/a
Side B (NDV): n/a
2023
| Estimated Fatalities | |
|---|---|
| High | 4 |
| Best | 4 |
| Low | 4 |
Secondary Warring Support:
Side A (Deebam): n/a
Side B (NDV): n/a
2025
| Estimated Fatalities | |
|---|---|
| High | 26 |
| Best | 17 |
| Low | 17 |
Secondary Warring Support:
Side A (Deebam): n/a
Side B (NDV): n/a
Dyad Archive
This section contains annual information no longer systematically collected by the UCDP.
2003 Dyad Archive
Terminated: NO
2016 Dyad Archive
Terminated: NO
2017 Dyad Archive
Terminated: NO
2019 Dyad Archive
Terminated: NO
2020 Dyad Archive
Terminated: NO
2022 Dyad Archive
Terminated: NO
2023 Dyad Archive
Terminated: NO
2025 Dyad Archive
Terminated: NO
